Measure Of Clustering Agreement

We present an example of purity calculation in Figure 16.4. Invalid clusterings have purity values close to 0, a perfect clustering has a purity of 1 . Purity is compared to the other three measures that are dealt with in this chapter in Table 16.2. We described how clustering results are verified using the silhouette method and the Dunn index. This task is facilitated by the combination of two R functions: eclust () and fviz_silhouette in the de factoextra package We also showed how to evaluate the agreement between a clustering result and an external reference. In the following chapters, we`ll show i) how to select the right clustering algorithm for your data. and (ii) calculating p values for hierarchical grouping. Unlike previous research (Pfitzner et al 2009; Vinh et al 2010), we discovered that the normalization of mutual information does not protect against sensitivity to imbalance in cluster size. Instead, our results are consistent with De Souto et al.

(2012). In this paper, we have, by examining in depth the weightings, more precisely how the two standardizations of mutual information are sensitive to the imbalance of cluster size. We provided mathematical evidence of optimal cluster size and weighting, and illustrated the consequences of cluster size imbalance using graphic representation and various numerical examples. Specifically, we have shown that the relationship between index value and cluster sizes is quite complex when there is an imbalance in cluster size. Whether small, medium or large clusters have the greatest impact on total value depends on the combination of cluster sizes. Therefore, the totals do not have a universal or intuitive interpretation of the restoration of individual clusters. We state that we are aware that these global measures are indeed affected by an imbalance in cluster size. RAR code calculation functions for two arbitrary clusters have been implemented in MATLAB (Release 14) and are available in Supplement 4 or on the toolbox website [22]. Several packages and programming languages were used to implement clustering algorithms.

Optimization and changes in existing methods are generally introduced during the development and implementation of these codes, resulting in new versions of the original methods with various improvements to make these codes more effective [47]. To assess similarities in clustering algorithms, several ratios were identified[24] against standardized mutual information, the fowlkes mallows index, the adjusted margin index and the Jaccard index. In addition, the work of Shirkhorshidi et al. [48] examined the influence of similarity and dissimilarity on the grouping, while Zhang and Fang [49] examined the lack of data and insinuations about the validity of the grouping.


Comments are closed.