Service Level Agreement Carve Out

Service level requirements are broken down into a specific formula for calculating fee reductions or service credits that the provider must deliver to the customer when the service is below the required level of service. Reductions or service credits can be weighted based on their relative importance. Service credits are generally expressed as a percentage of the fees charged for the service concerned, which are charged to the customer on future charges if the provider does not meet a level of service. In general, customers should not accept the first or cheapest service offer. There are sometimes huge differences in value for money and quality. This is why it is recommended to think carefully and consider references. With a well-designed ALS, supported by a reliable provider, service customers can save a lot of money while enjoying consistent quality. In addition, it is possible to avoid unnecessary oversupply. On the other hand, in important locations, ALS encourages the service provider in a targeted manner. In short, alS can therefore be described as an excellent service quality control tool.

Measures should be designed so that bad conduct is not rewarded by both parties. If z.B. a service level is violated because the customer does not provide information on time, the provider should not be penalized. Ideally, ALS should be aligned with the technological or commercial objectives of the commitment. The wrong direction can have a negative impact on the pricing of deals, the quality of the service delivery and the customer experience. An ALS outlines the service obligations of the provider with respect to the services it provides to the customer in measurable and objective terms against defined service level requirements. Most service providers have standard SLAs – sometimes several, which reflect different levels of service at different prices – which can be a good starting point for negotiations. However, these should be audited and modified by the client and the lawyer, as they are generally favourable to the supplier. 3. Reaction and repair time. Response times show how quickly the creditor must respond to you if you report a problem (only to confirm that you have received your request and are working on it). These are often referred to as non-binding “goals,” but you want them to be binding deadlines, with a remedy if they are missed.

Repair times (i.e. the deadline for the full resolution of the problem) can also be identified as non-binding targets or are often left completely unwinded. You want a fixed time frame to solve the problem. Suppliers can tell you that they have deliberately omitted repair times because they cannot determine how long it will take to resolve a problem before they know the cause. That`s a fair point, but at some point, whatever the cause, you pay for a service you don`t get. It is therefore perfectly reasonable to request a delay or recover money in the form of ALS credits (see below). No matter why it doesn`t work, it just makes sure it works when you need it. Remember that this only applies to things that are the supplier`s “mistakes” (see “Uptime” above), so it`s fair for you to ask, whatever the cause of the problem.


Comments are closed.